Abstract

Summary 1. The term ‘dispersal limitation’ represents two distinct component processes: the number of seeds produced (fecundity) and the spatial pattern of the seed rain (distribution). We present a quantitative evaluation of these component processes of dispersal limitation for a tropical forest tree community. 2. Using a regularly spaced grid of 289 seed traps (0.5 m 2 each), we monitored the seed rain into 1.44 ha of upper Amazonian floodplain forest for 6 years whilst concurrently monitoring sapling recruitment ina 0.81-ha subplot centred withinthe seed-trapping grid. Thisarrangementallowed us to comparethespatial patternof seedrainwiththat ofsaplingrecruitment. 3. We endeavoured to distinguish between undispersed and dispersed seeds by applying a series of criteria to seeds collected in the traps and by removing from certain analyses all seeds that fell under reproductive conspecifics. Gross fecundity of 30 common species that contribute to the advanced regeneration was uniformly low and the rain of dispersed seeds was lower still, being <1.0 m )2 year )1 ineverycase. 4. The rain of dispersed seeds with respect to conspecific reproductives closely matched the recruitment ofsaplings, whereasgrossseedrain(allseeds,includingundispersedseeds)didnot. 5. Synthesis. ‘Dispersal limitation’ inthisfaunally intactAmazonianforestisprimarily attributable to a scant rain of dispersed seeds, i.e. fecundity limitation, whereas the distribution of dispersed seeds, being random for most species, appears adequate. Evidence from this and earlier research at the same site indicates that the per-capita success of dispersed seeds is many times higher than that of undispersed seeds. Thus, seed dispersal kernels that do not distinguish between dispersed and undispersed seedsare likely tobebiologicallymisleading.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call