Abstract
As revolutionary as Achebe's Things Fall Apart was for the Nigerian elite in the immediate aftermath of its publication, the Onitsha Market writers were initially oblivious and later impervious to the novel's groundbreak- ing feat. Few pamphleteers engaged with the colonial theme and their exertions—admittedly not beholden to Achebe's work—have not received scholarly attention. After the heyday of the Onitsha Market phenomenon, its most famous writer, Ogali A.Ogali, composed his first full-length novel, The Juju Priest (1977). While Ogali had previously dealt with colonialism in earlier pamphlets, Achebe's formal, stylistic, and ideological influence became apparent in this first novel. This essay reads Ogali A. Ogali's The Juju Priest as a window into a non-elite experience with the convolutions of mental colonization and cultural nationalism and complicates Peter Ayers and Reinhard Sander's reading of the novel by arguing that The Juju Priest is an allegory of Ogali's particular process of mental decolonization. I set the scene by discussing the peculiarities of Ogali's booming career as an Onitsha pamphleteer and then examine The Juju Priest at three distinct lev- els: first, by exploring Ogali's striking mimesis and subversion of colonial discourse in the first part of the novel, which coincides with his use of the cynical-satirical mode; second, by discussing his comic-satirical construc- tion of colonial mimics and cultural nationalists; and finally, by looping back to the author's earlier works, The History of Item (1960), the unpublished pamphlet No Country Is Civilized (1964-65), and "No Heaven for a Priest" (1971). Intriguingly, the intertextual relationship between Ogali's The Juju Priest and Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart seems to indicate Ogali's latent wish to transcend his status as a popular writer. Throughout my analysis, I flesh out Achebe's influence on Ogali's novel and then zoom in on the con - vergences and divergences in the two writers' engagement with the colonial encounter and epistemic violence in the final part of the essay.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.