Decoding oxygen prescriptions: electronic health record documentation versus patient-reported use

Abstract

BackgroundLong term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is prescribed for hypoxemia in pulmonary disease. Like other medical therapies, LTOT requires a prescription documenting the dosage (flow rate) and directions (at rest, with activity) which goes to a supplier. Communication with patients regarding oxygen prescription (flow rate, frequency, directions), monitoring (pulse oximetry) and dosage adjustment (oxygen titration) differs in comparison with medication prescriptions. We examined the communication of oxygen management plans in the electronic health record (EHR), and their consistency with patient-reported LTOT use.Study design and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 71 adults with chronic lung disease on LTOT. Physician communication regarding oxygen management was obtained from the EHR. Participants were interviewed on their LTOT management plan. The information from each source was compared.ResultsThe study population was, on average, 64 years, two-thirds women, and most used oxygen for over 3 years. Only 45% of both at-rest and with-activity oxygen prescriptions were documented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Less than 20% of prescriptions were relayed to the patient in the after-visit summary. Of those with EHR-documented oxygen prescriptions, 44% of patients adhered to prescribed oxygen flow rates. Nearly all patients used a pulse oximeter (96%).InterpretationWe identified significant gaps in communication of oxygen management plans from provider to patient. Even when the oxygen prescription was clearly documented, there were differences in patient-reported oxygen management. Critical gaps in oxygen therapy result from the lack of consistent documentation of oxygen prescriptions in the EHR and patient-facing documents. Addressing these issues systematically may improve home oxygen management.