Abstract

For more than 4 decades, it has been shown that humans are particularly sensitive to biological motion and extract socially relevant information from it such as gender, intentions, emotions or a person’s identity. A growing number of findings, however, indicate that identity perception is not always highly accurate, especially due to large inter-individual differences and a fuzzy self-recognition advantage compared to the recognition of others. Here, we investigated the self-other identification performance and sought to relate this performance to the metric properties of perceptual/physical representations of individual motor signatures. We show that identity perception ability varies substantially across individuals and is associated to the perceptual/physical motor similarities between self and other stimuli. Specifically, we found that the perceptual representations of postural signatures are veridical in the sense that closely reflects the physical postural trajectories and those similarities between people’ actions elicit numerous misattributions. While, on average, people can well recognize their self-generated actions, they more frequently attribute to themselves the actions of those acting in a similar way. These findings are consistent with the common coding theory and support that perception and action are tightly linked and may modulate each other by virtue of similarity.

Highlights

  • One of the more stunning examples of the human visual system ability is to ‘decode’ the identity of individuals directly through their motion even from impoverished point-light animations (Beardsworth & Buckner, 1981; Cutting &Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Kozlowski, 1977; Loula, Prasad, Harber & Shiffrar, 2005; Yovel & O’Toole, 2016)

  • We found that some participants (e.g., P4 and P13) adopted a very high acceptance criterion, claiming authorship for almost all videos including those of others

  • Comparing visually the performance across groups of participants with similar signatures, it can be observed that the variation in performance within groups is smaller than the variation between groups (SI Appendix, Fig. SI8), suggesting that individual differences in identity perception ability relies more on individual variations in kinematic patterns rather than on differences in visual processing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the more stunning examples of the human visual system ability is to ‘decode’ the identity of individuals directly through their motion even from impoverished point-light animations Since each individual can best reproduce its own actions, the perceived similarity as well as the activation of action representation are assumed to be maximal and might explain a greater performance for self-recognition despite the fact that people are not used to observing themself from an external point of view (Beardsworth & Buckner, 1981; Cook, Johnston & Heyes, 2012; Jokish, Daum & Troje, 2006; Knoblich & Flach, 2001; Loula et al, 2005; Prasad & Shiffrar, 2009) It raises the problem of action attribution in particular if a person moves the same way as ours. Using point-light depictions of themselves and fourteen other people (unknown to the participants) with a wide range of signatures (similar/different), we probed the self/other discrimination performance

Participants
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call