Abstract

ObjectiveGovernments across the world have deployed a wide range of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Certain NPIs, like limiting social contacts or lockdowns, had negative consequences for mental health in the population. Especially elder people are prone to mental illnesses during the current pandemic. This article investigates how social factors, infections rates, and stringency of NPIs are associated with a decline in mental health in different European countries.MethodsData stem from the eighth wave of the SHARE survey. Additional data sources were used to build macro indicators for infection rates and NPIs. Two subsamples of persons with mental health problems were selected (people who reported being depressed, n = 9.240 or nervous/anxious, n = 10.551). Decline in mental health was assessed by asking whether depressive symptoms or nervousness/anxiety have become worse since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. For each outcome, logistic regression models with survey-design were used to estimate odds ratios (OR), using social factors (age, gender, education, living alone, and personal contacts) and macro indicators (stringency of NPIs and infection rates) as predictors.ResultsHigher age was associated with a lower likelihood of becoming more depressed (OR 0.87) or nervous/anxious (OR 0.88), while female gender increased the odds of a decline in mental health (OR 1.53 for being more depressed; OR 1.57 for being more nervous/anxious). Higher education was only associated with becoming more nervous/anxious (OR 1.59), while living alone or rare personal contacts were not statistically significant. People from countries with higher infection rates were more likely to become more depressed (OR 3.31) or nervous/anxious (OR 4.12), while stringency of NPIs showed inconsistent associations.ConclusionA majority of European older adults showed a decline in mental health since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. This is especially true in countries with high prevalence rates of COVID-19. Among older European adults, age seems to be a protective factor for a decline in mental health while female gender apparently is a risk factor. Moreover, although NPIs are an essential preventative mechanism to reduce the pandemic spread, they might influence the vulnerability for elderly people suffering from mental health problems.

Highlights

  • The new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), first discovered in December 2019 in Wuhan City, China, has spread worldwide

  • The fact that especially older people were at higher risk for adverse health outcomes due to COVID-19 might explain why— compared to surveys that included younger populations— we found a higher proportion of decline in mental health, which did occur in countries with strict government response measures

  • We found no evidence that the government response measures, indicated by the stringency index, were associated with feeling more nervous and/or anxious

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), first discovered in December 2019 in Wuhan City, China, has spread worldwide. Governments across the world have deployed a wide range of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The responses to COVID-19 in different countries varied from herd immunity strategies, which implied only few or almost no measures, to more assertive approaches based on the implementation of a wide range of stringent NPIs [2, 3]. The prevalence of COVID-19 affected the stringency of NPIs implemented in different countries. Countries undertaking more strict measures were able to contain the pandemic outbreak. There were both great variations in the stringency of government responses and infection rates of COVID-19 between countries worldwide [4, 5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call