Abstract

Simple SummaryWomen diagnosed with cancer at reproductive age often face potential impairments in fertility due to cancer treatments and complex and uncertain fertility decisions. The complexity of the decision-making process is often associated with psychological distress and a potential for long-term decisional regret around a decision made at diagnosis, which may have a negative impact on patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Some factors have been associated with the experience of regret, such as patients’ perceived quality and satisfaction with the fertility counseling received, the decision to undergo fertility preservation procedures, desire for children and decisional regret. Awareness of these factors is of utmost importance to support and guide this population through their fertility decision-making process.It is well established that fertility is an important issue for young women with cancer at reproductive age, as many have not initiated or completed their parenthood goals when diagnosed. Because cancer treatments may impair fertility, women face fertility decisions that are often complex and surrounded by uncertainty. This may put patients at risk for psychological distress and the experience of regret regarding decisions made at diagnosis, which may be associated with a negative impact on women’s QoL. This narrative review addresses current knowledge about decisional regret regarding fertility preservation decisions in adult female cancer patients at reproductive age. Electronic searches were conducted on Pubmed database for articles published in English from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2021 that assessed decisional regret following fertility decisions in young women diagnosed at childbearing age. Of the 96 articles identified, nine provided information on decisional regret regarding fertility decisions. Studies reported that, overall, decisional regret regarding oncofertility decisions was low. Factors associated with the experience of decisional regret were patients’ perceived quality and satisfaction with fertility counseling received, the decision to undergo fertility preservation, desire for children and decisional conflict. Health providers should be aware of the factors that are potentially modifiable and prone to improvement in order to reduce decisional regret. All efforts should be made to improve availability of and access to tailored high quality fertility counseling and fertility preservation. Given the growing evidence that decision aids (DAs) are effective in increasing knowledge and reducing decisional conflict and regret, their use in a routine and timely manner to complement fertility counseling is recommended.

Highlights

  • The importance of fertility to young cancer patients and the wish to have biological children in the future is well established

  • Fertility specialist): 8.4 (4.4) - Receiving counseling from a fertility specialist and fertility preservation (FP) appears to decrease regret. - Women counseled about fertility by both an oncology team and a fertility specialist had significantly less regret about their FP decision than those counseled only by an oncology team - Among those women who were counseled by their oncologist, the largest difference in regret was noted between women who took action to preserve their FP and those who did not

  • Despite the methodological heterogeneity across studies focusing on decisional regret following oncofertility decisions, findings revealed that a majority of women reported low levels of decisional regret regarding fertility decisions after a cancer diagnosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of fertility to young cancer patients and the wish to have biological children in the future is well established. Fertility decisions are rarely confined to only one decision, but comprise several decisions, involving multiple options with different risks, benefits and future outcomes; in addition, future difficult ethical and legal issues need to be considered. In this context, decision-making is surrounded by uncertainty given the preference-sensitive nature of the decision, as medical evidence and clinical expertise suggest that there is more than one reasonable medical option, and the choice of what is the best option for patients depends on their preferences, characteristics and circumstances. The ultimate fertility decision is defined by an interplay of factors, from the personal, familial, medical, ethical and spiritual levels, and may have short and long-term consequences on patients’ Quality of Life (QoL) and mental health [11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call