Abstract

Critical land has become a problem in the world. Critical land is very detrimental to the health of the land. Several factors cause the land to become critical. One of them is the use of land that is not by the capabilities of the land. If no repairs made, the land will be physically, chemically, and biologically damaged. Klaten Regency is one of the regencies in Central Java Province, which has quite extensive critical land. It is necessary to monitor and improve land quality regularly to avoid critical land problems. Data and information on critical land obtained from Klaten Regency processed into a decision support system. Decision Support System uses a combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. In this research, a Web-based Decision Support System created to determine the critical land area in Klaten Regency. The information system created has an alternative menu and criteria that determine the potential of critical land in Klaten Regency, making it easier for users to obtain information.

Highlights

  • IntroductionRegional Development Planning Agency Klaten Regency has difficulty in determining critical land

  • Critical land becomes a problem in data processing in the environmental field[1, 2]

  • The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has several advantages, it cannot be separated from the shortcomings, the method is less effective if it is used in cases that have a large number of criteria and alternatives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regional Development Planning Agency Klaten Regency has difficulty in determining critical land. This is due to various parameter values and criteria. We need a system that can provide information about critical land in Klaten Regency accurately, effectively and. The system created can assist the Regional Development Planning Agency Klaten Regency in making decisions to determine the potential for critical land in accordance with existing criteria. This study uses 6 criteria in determining Critical Land. The implementation of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods as a Decision Support System will provide more effective and efficient processing of this data and can be used as a mapping illustration in an area to determine critical land

Literature Review
Research Methodology
Criteria Weights
Determination of Priority Weight Value Criteria
C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Determination of Weighted Normalization
Determination of The Value of the Ideal Solution
3.10 Determination of The Rank
Result
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.