Abstract

BackgroundDecision-making is an essential function of everyday life. Decision-making under explicit risk requires developing advantageous decision strategies based on fixed outcomes (e.g., probabilities of winning or losing a bet). Decision-making and its neural substrates have been rarely studied in MS. We expected performance in decision-making under risk to be lowered in MS patients, and negatively correlated with disease-related disability, cognition, and ventricular width.MethodsThree groups were included: 32 MS patients and 20 healthy controls were examined with conventional neuropsychological tests and the Game-of-Dice Task (GDT) assessing decision-making under explicit risk. Linear 2-D ventricular width was assessed on MS patients’ clinical MRIs and compared to a third group, 20 non-MS neurological control patients.ResultsCompared to healthy controls, MS patients showed impaired GDT and neuropsychological performance, depending on the MS-subtype (relapsing-remitting (RR), n = 22; secondary progressive, n = 10) and disability severity among RR-MS patients. In MS patients, GDT performance correlated with processing speed, intercaudate ratio, and third ventricle ratio (p’s < 0.05). Mediation analysis showed that the link between GDT performance and processing speed was fully explained by ventricular size.ConclusionDecision-making under explicit risk was reduced in MS patients, but only those with more pronounced disability. Independent of processing speed, decision-making under explicit risk correlates inversely with central atrophy in MS.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Decision-making is an essential function of everyday life

  • Comparing individual Multiple sclerosis (MS) patient subgroups against healthy controls, the RR-1 group underperformed in memory and global cognitive functions, the RR-2 group scored below healthy controls in all domains, and the secondary progressive (SP) group was impaired in all domains except executive functions

  • Comparing the different MS subgroups with healthy controls showed that Game-of-Dice Task (GDT) net-scores were significantly reduced only in the RR-2 and SP groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision-making under explicit risk requires developing advantageous decision strategies based on fixed outcomes (e.g., probabilities of winning or losing a bet). We expected performance in decision-making under risk to be lowered in MS patients, and negatively correlated with disease-related disability, cognition, and ventricular width. The Game-of-Dice Task (GDT [16]) assesses decision-making under explicit risk and emphasizes the Radomski et al BMC Neurology (2015) 15:61 cognitive aspects of decision-making by providing information about winning/ losing probabilities associated with each choice. Cogo and others (2014) [25] found 60 relapsing-remitting MS patients with minimal disability (mean EDSS = 1.4) but longer disease duration (mean = 40.8 months) unimpaired on the GDT. GDT performance in MS patients was unrelated to other cognitive functions.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call