Abstract

Universities worldwide strive to provide the best student services possible, particularly those that support student achievements and career goals. Therefore, academic advising continues to be a significant part of the student experience, one which universities need to fully understand in terms of its objectives, application processes, and required skill. As a result of significant technological improvements since the turn of the millennium, including expanding internet applications and digital transformations, universities have established computer information systems that support academic advising and course registration services. This study examined the effects of modifications to the electronic academic advising and course registration systems at King Abdulaziz University in 2018, and then again in 2020, following a university-wide system failure in 2018 resulting from a demand overload. In 2018, a preliminary statistical analysis and student feedback survey were conducted by the authors to measure student satisfaction with the online portal On-Demand University Services (ODUS Plus). In addition to recommendations suggested by the 2018 analysis such as balancing the load distribution of the university’s network, organizational (i.e., non-technical) solutions, rules, and regulations were adjusted such as progressive course registration that prioritized those expected to graduate first. The survey and analysis were repeated by the authors in 2020 to assess improvements in student satisfaction. As a result of the changes, the investigation revealed improved student satisfaction with the performance of ODUS Plus and network access. Overall, students were significantly more satisfied in 2020 than in 2018. This research shows that some technical challenges can be resolved using re-engineered processes and organizational solutions.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilThe primary objective of this paper is to investigate how changes made to the electronic educational systems of higher education institutions may affect institutional decisionmaking strategies

  • While this study evaluated some changes made to the electronic education system used by King Abdulaziz University, a leading public university in Saudi Arabia, this study is an attempt to stay abreast of recent developments to improve the educational process, especially in terms of digital transformation, which may be central both to enhancing the process and in decision-making

  • The results reveal that the 4.5 grade point average (GPA) group and above was connected to the value differences between student feedback regarding progressive course registration for those expected to graduate first, with the highest average, while the 2.0–2.74 GPA group was connected to value differences between student feedback regarding the availability registration for the male campus students on days other than those reserved to the female campus students, as well as the academic advisor, which had the lowest average, as compared to the rest of the GPA categories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primary objective of this paper is to investigate how changes made to the electronic educational systems of higher education institutions may affect institutional decisionmaking strategies. This study contributes to the ongoing academic and practical discussions concerning the efficacy of digital transformation of higher education institutions based on the latest artificial intelligence developments. While this study evaluated some changes made to the electronic education system used by King Abdulaziz University, a leading public university in Saudi Arabia, this study is an attempt to stay abreast of recent developments to improve the educational process, especially in terms of digital transformation, which may be central both to enhancing the process and in decision-making. The university stage is considered the essential link in the educational chain due to its contributions to developing the student’s critical thinking skills as well as their resilience iations.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call