Abstract
The recent surge in AI technologies places a premium on decision-making skills as a complement to the technology. Yet, little is known about how decision-making skills are developed. We theorize and provide empirical evidence of the benefits of experience – intensity, diversity and difficulty – for developing quality decision-making skills, evaluated as such relative to the performance of a mature AI – a technology with performance superior to that of humans – as a benchmark. AI advancements not only increase the importance of decision-making skills as complements, but also provide a new benchmark against which organizations will likely evaluate talent, given the alternative of seeking automation. We test our hypotheses in the context of online chess, a setting where decision-making skills are critical for performance and where a mature benchmark AI exists.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
