Abstract

To address the situation where incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relation (IHFPR) is necessary, this paper develops decision-making models taking into account decision makers’ satisfaction degree. First, the consistency measures, respectively, from the perspectives of additive and multiplicative consistent IHFPR are defined, which is based on the relationships of the IHPFRs and their corresponding priority weight vector. Second, two decision-making models are developed, respectively, in view of the proposed additive and multiplicative consistency measures. The main characteristic of the constructed models is they taking into account the decision makers’ satisfaction degree. The objective functions of the models are developed by maximizing the parameter of the satisfaction degree. Third, a square programming model is developed to obtain the decision makers’ weights by utilizing the optimal priority weight vectors information, the solution of the model is obtained by solving the partial derivatives of Lagrange function. Finally, a procedure for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems with IHFPRs is given, and an illustrative example in conjunction with comparative analysis is used to demonstrate the proposed models are feasible and efficiency for practical MCDM problems.

Highlights

  • Group decision making (GDM) is a specific type of decision problem where several/many decision makers cooperate with each other and choose the best solution from a set of possible alternatives (Rabiee, Aslani, & Rezaei, 2021)

  • Two decision-making models are developed in view of the proposed additive and multiplicative consistency measures

  • This paper develops decision-making models based on decision makers’ satisfaction degree with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relation (IHFPR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Group decision making (GDM) is a specific type of decision problem where several/many decision makers cooperate with each other and choose the best solution from a set of possible alternatives (Rabiee, Aslani, & Rezaei, 2021). Lots of MCDM approaches have been developed to managing incomplete information This method firstly obtained the missing values based on certain rules, and derived priority weight vector from complete FPR. Et al (2015b) developed two methods to estimate the missing elements in an IHFPR based on the properties of additive consistent HFPR, while Z. Et al (2016) developed two goal programming models to derive the priority weights from an IHFPR based on additive and multiplicative consistency, respectively. 2016), develops in considering ordered FPRs derived from normalized IHFPR may distort the preference information (2) To consider the satisfaction degree of decision makers, two decision-making models are developed based on the proposed additive and multiplicative consistency measures.

Preliminaries
Additive and multiplicative consistent IHFPR
Framework of MCDM procedure with IHFPRs
Illustrative example
Illustration of the proposed method
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call