Abstract
AbstractTwo studies examined cognitive and affect‐based heuristics as predictors of public choice. Participants, recruited before the 2004 Presidential Election, identified the issues that would determine their voting decision and provided ratings of importance and Likelihood of Success for these issues (decision cues) regarding each presidential candidate. Both well‐known and new heuristics were evaluated for descriptive fit between predicted and actual voting choices and overall predictive accuracy regarding who the winner of the sample would be. In Study 1, the performance of cue‐weight free simple heuristics, particularly those based on frequency counts, matched or outperformed that of normative Franklin's rule that used both cue values and cue weights. In Study 2, the affect (admiration and contempt)‐based heuristics performed even better. The Take‐The‐Best Emotion heuristic performed as well as the affect heuristics utilizing multiple social emotions. These findings highlight the utility of event frequency‐based and interpersonal affect‐based heuristics in predicting public choice under uncertainty. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
