Abstract

Currently, a global analysis of the information available on the relative composition of the floral scents of a very diverse variety of plant species is missing. Such analysis may reveal general patterns on the distribution and dominance of the volatile compounds that form these mixtures, and may also allow measuring the effects of factors such as the phylogeny, pollination vectors, and climatic conditions on the floral scents of the species. To fill this gap, we compiled published data on the relative compositions and emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the floral scents of 305 plant species from 66 families. We also gathered information on the groups of pollinators that visited the flowers and the climatic conditions in the areas of distribution of these species. This information allowed us to characterize the occurrence and relative abundances of individual volatiles in floral scents and the effects of biotic and climatic factors on floral scent. The monoterpenes trans-β-ocimene and linalool and the benzenoid benzaldehyde were the most abundant floral VOCs, in both ubiquity and predominance in the floral blends. Floral VOC richness and relative composition were moderately preserved traits across the phylogeny. The reliance on different pollinator groups and the climate also had important effects on floral VOC richness, composition, and emission rates of the species. Our results support the hypothesis that key compounds or compounds originating from specific biosynthetic pathways mediate the attraction of the main pollinators. Our results also indicate a prevalence of monoterpenes in the floral blends of plants that grow in drier conditions, which could link with the fact that monoterpene emissions protect plants against oxidative stresses throughout drought periods and their emissions are enhanced under moderate drought stress. Sesquiterpenes, in turn, were positively correlated with mean annual temperature, supporting that sesquiterpene emissions are dominated mainly by ambient temperature. This study is the first to quantitatively summarise data on floral-scent emissions and provides new insights into the biotic and climatic factors that influence floral scents.

Highlights

  • Floral scent is an important trait of flowering plants and plays major roles in the interactions of plants with other organisms, including the attraction of pollinators (Raguso, 2004; Schiestl, 2010; FarréArmengol et al, 2013; Junker and Parachnowitsch, 2015; Kantsa et al, 2018)

  • Phylogenetic signals were detected for floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) richness, relative composition and emission rates for some groups of compounds (Table 1), supporting that to some extent the compositions and rates of emission of floral scents have been preserved throughout evolutionary history

  • The emission rates of nitrogen-containing compounds were negatively correlated with mean annual precipitation (Table 4). All these results suggest that climate is a relevant factor determining the compositions and emission rates of floral scents, in addition to the strong and well-known selective pressures exerted by biotic agents such as pollinators and other floral visitors (Jacobsen and Olsen, 1994; Yua et al, 2009; Farré-Armengol et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floral scent is an important trait of flowering plants and plays major roles in the interactions of plants with other organisms, including the attraction of pollinators (Raguso, 2004; Schiestl, 2010; FarréArmengol et al, 2013; Junker and Parachnowitsch, 2015; Kantsa et al, 2018). Effective pollinators (those that carry pollen from the anthers to the stigmas of conspecific plants) are either specialist floral visitors of a limited spectrum of plant species or generalist floral visitors with a short-term specialization known as flower constancy (Chittka et al, 1999). Notable evidence suggests that pollinators have strong evolutionary impacts on the intensity and composition of floral scents emitted by plants (Parachnowitsch et al, 2012; Parachnowitsch et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call