Abstract

This paper outlines an approach to teaching business school undergraduates about fundamental change in the distribution of power, or revolution under capitalism. This is based on a comparative analysis of three film extracts from: Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin (1925) and Strike (1925); and Billy Elliot (2000). Similarities and contrasts across these extracts can help students appreciate different theoretical perspectives on power and collective resistance to capitalism. These extracts introduce undergraduates to a central distinction in critique of capitalism - between a Marxist account of revolution (class consciousness is sufficient for successful revolution), and a Marxist-Leninist account (revolutions must be led). Following a well established tradition of connecting Marx's ideas to Aristotle, the paper outlines how this approach is underpinned by a theory of aesthetic engagement based on Aristotle’s intellectual virtues, or different ways of knowing. Comparative analysis of these films is proposed as a way to overcome two barriers to learning about these fundamental ideas in social science: the institutionalized, managerialist logic of business schools under capitalism; and the lack of experience of collectivism among business school undergraduates.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call