Abstract

BackgroundThe ideal conduit for repair of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) during the Ross procedure remains unclear and has yet to be fully elucidated. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of decellularized versus cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure.Main bodyAfter a comprehensive literature search, studies comparing decellularized and cryopreserved allografts for patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were pooled to perform a pairwise meta-analysis using the random-effects model. Primary outcomes were early mortality and follow-up allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rates and follow-up endocarditis. A total of 4 studies including 1687 patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were included. A total of 812 patients received a decellularized pulmonary allograft, while 875 received a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. Compared to cryopreserved allografts, the decellularized group showed similar rates of early mortality (odds ratio, 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 0.21–1.41, P = 0.22). At a mean follow-up period of 5.89 years, no significant difference was observed between the two groups for follow-up allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio, 0.65, 95% confidence interval, 0.20–2.14, P = 0.48). Similarly, no difference was seen in reintervention rates (hazard ratio, 0.54, 95% confidence interval, 0.09–3.12, P = 0.49) nor endocarditis (hazard ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.07–1.35, P = 0.12) at a mean follow-up of 4.85 and 5.75 years, respectively.ConclusionsDecellularized and cryopreserved pulmonary allografts are associated with similar postoperative outcomes for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure. Larger propensity-matched and randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate the efficacy of decellularized allografts compared to cryopreserved allografts in the setting of the Ross.

Highlights

  • For younger patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, the Ross procedure offers an alternative to artificial conduits and has been shown to have favorable hemodynamics and long-term viability [1]

  • Decellularized and cryopreserved pulmonary allografts are associated with similar postoperative outcomes for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction during the Ross procedure

  • Larger propensity-matched and randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate the efficacy of decellularized allografts compared to cryopreserved allografts in the setting of the Ross

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For younger patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, the Ross procedure offers an alternative to artificial conduits and has been shown to have favorable hemodynamics and long-term viability [1]. Ahmed et al Egypt Heart J (2021) 73:100 allografts are the golden standard for repair of the right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (RVOT) during the Ross procedure, but their use has been associated with increased risk of reoperation and immunological responses. While previous isolated observational studies have reported the clinical outcomes of decellularized and cryopreserved allografts use in the Ross procedure, consensus over the optimal strategy is still lacking. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of decellularized versus cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure. A comprehensive literature search was performed on May 1, 2021, to find trials and observational cohort investigations comparing the use of decellularized and cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for RVOT reconstruction in patients undergoing the Ross procedure. A full outline of the search strategies for PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus is collated in Additional file 1: Table S1

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call