Abstract

We consider the $X(3872)$ resonance as a $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ $D\bar D^*$ hadronic molecule. According to heavy quark spin symmetry, there will exist a partner with quantum numbers $2^{++}$, $X_{2}$, which would be a $D^*\bar D^*$ loosely bound state. The $X_{2}$ is expected to decay dominantly into $D\bar D$, $D\bar D^*$ and $\bar D D^*$ in $d$-wave. In this work, we calculate the decay widths of the $X_{2}$ resonance into the above channels, as well as those of its bottom partner, $X_{b2}$, the mass of which comes from assuming heavy flavor symmetry for the contact terms. We find partial widths of the $X_{2}$ and $X_{b2}$ of the order of a few MeV. Finally, we also study the radiative $X_2\to D\bar D^{*}\gamma$ and $X_{b2} \to \bar B B^{*}\gamma$ decays. These decay modes are more sensitive to the long-distance structure of the resonances and to the $D\bar D^{*}$ or $B\bar B^{*}$ final state interaction.

Highlights

  • X (3872) resonance, first observed by the Belle Collaboration in 2003 [3], which can be thought of as a D D ∗ bound state with J PC = 1++

  • In this work we have studied the hadronic and radiative decays of a molecular P∗ P ∗ state with quantum numbers J PC = 2++ in the charm (X2) and bottom (Xb2) sectors using an effective field theory (EFT) approach

  • We have considered the X (3872) resonance as a J PC = 1++ D D ∗ hadronic molecule

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It seems natural to expect a 2++ D∗ D ∗ loosely bound state (X2), the HQSS partner of the X (3872), and located in the vicinity of the D∗0 D ∗0 threshold (∼ 4014 MeV) [7,8,15] Our predictions in Eq (12), both for the mass and the B∗ B ∗ coupling of the resonance show some dependence on the UV cutoff, which is to some extent diminished when HQSS uncertainties are taken into account This dependence might hint to non-negligible subleading corrections (among others, pion-exchange and coupled-channel effects [7], which can be larger here than in the charm sector due to the larger binding energy and larger meson masses). We will compute the decay widths for both UV regulators, and the spread of results will account for this source of uncertainty

The hadronic X2 and Xb2 decays
Charm decays
Charm decays: further analysis of uncertainties
Bottom decays
The X2 and Xb2 radiative decays
K g2mπ 8π fπ2
Tree level approximation
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call