Abstract

The decarbonization of EU energy system is under way, but manufacturing industry is still using approximately 25% of the EU total final energy use. To maintain long-term competitiveness while contributing to the EU goal of carbon neutrality by 2050, manufacturing industry needs to improve energy efficiency in a cost-effective way. One important way to achieve this is through energy audits. The Energy Efficiency Directive promotes member states’ development of energy efficiency programs to encourage industry to undergo energy audits. Previous studies have reviewed industrial energy efficiency policy program evaluations and argued that there is no harmonized way to conduct them. This leads to difficulties in: i) comparing energy efficiency and cost saving potentials throughout different programs, and ii) providing necessary information that supports the improvement of the policy program. Therefore, we argue that a harmonized methodology for industrial energy efficiency policy program evaluation is of great importance, and, we have developed a set of five-steps guidelines that lay the foundation for an ex-ante energy efficiency policy program evaluation methodology. The guidelines are to be be conducted during the lifetime of the program, in five steps, as follows: (s1) define key issues, (s2) set the objectives for each key issue, (s3) identify the options for each key issue, (s4) analyze options from an energy and environmental perspective, and (s5) compare options and select the recommended one. Our proposed methodology will support policymakers and evaluators answer questions such as: i) how can the objectives of the policy program be achieved? ii) is there any need to change the policy program? Furthermore, a comparison in terms of relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of all major policy options developed, including the status quo option is proposed in the methodology. This paper can be seen an important step towards the goal of creating a harmonized policy evaluation methodology.

Highlights

  • Energy efficiency is seen as the ‘‘the first fuel’’ of a country, because it is the one energy resource that all countries own in abundance, and it is the key for cost-effective energy transition to decarbonization (International Energy Agency, 2018)

  • We argue in this paper that a harmonized methodology for industrial energy efficiency policy program evaluation studies must be seen as being of great importance

  • Albeit less common, is voluntary agreement programs (VAPs), e.g. the Swedish program for improving energy efficiency in energy-intensive industries (PFE), where mandatory energy audits were combined with the implementation of a standardized energy management system (Swedish Energy Agency, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy efficiency is seen as the ‘‘the first fuel’’ of a country, because it is the one energy resource that all countries own in abundance, and it is the key for cost-effective energy transition to decarbonization (International Energy Agency, 2018). A second generation or level of industrial policy programs is voluntary agreement programs (VAPs), which include energy management components (Thollander et al, 2020) This category includes energy efficiency networks, where companies receive support in network form for energy auditing and energy management activities. Johansson et al (2019) reviewed the scientific publications related to energy efficiency policies for industrial SMEs. Related to international policy program evaluation, Andersson et al (2017) performed a study to compare how energy audit policy program evaluations were conducted and how their results are presented. As Weiss (1998) underlines, a proper comparison of multiple energy efficiency programs is possible to be conducted if there is a certain degree of similarity in terms of measures, goals and activities At this point, one may ask what an evaluation of policy or program might look like, and what its intended use is.

Types of energy efficiency policy programs
Policy process
Policy evaluation
Key issues to be addressed
Concluding discussion
Findings
Declaration of competing interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call