Abstract
An in vitro study was conducted to determine the efficacy of 17% EDTA plus 1.25% sodium lauryl ether sulfate (EDTA-T), 10% citric acid, and 17% EDTA with respect to Ca(++) extraction. The root canals of 90 extracted human canines were instrumented by using the step-back technique. The teeth were randomly divided into 9 groups of 10 teeth each according to the solution and time intervals involved (ie, 3, 10, and 15 minutes). The Ca(++) concentration of the solution was determined by using atomic absorption spectroscopy. At 3 minutes, there was no significant difference between Ca(++) extraction by 10% citric acid and 17% EDTA (P >.05). EDTA-T had the least efficacy for Ca(++) extraction (P <.05). At 10 minutes and 15 minutes, there were no significant differences between 10% citric acid and 17% EDTA or between EDTA-T and 17% EDTA (P >.05). However, 10% citric acid was significantly better than EDTA-T in terms of Ca(++) extraction (P <.05). Both 10% citric acid and 17% EDTA are good decalcifying agents when the step-back technique is used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
