Abstract
We compare valuation effects associated with debt issuance under SEC Rule 144A versus issuance in the public market. We find that nonconvertible debt Rule 144A issuers experience an incremental positive announcement effect when compared to their counterparts issuing in the public market. We attribute this to the timing of issuance under favorable market conditions and a reduction in informational asymmetry due to lender specialization. When compared to their public counterparts, convertible Rule 144A bond issuers often experience negative announcement effects and inferior post-issuance stock performance. We argue that this negative market reaction arises from a stronger opportunistic market-timing signal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
