Abstract
Debris flows have been always a serious problem in the mountain areas. Research on the assessment of debris flows susceptibility (DFS) is useful for preventing and mitigating debris flow risks. The main purpose of this work is to study the DFS in the Shigatse area of Tibet, by using machine learning methods, after assessing the main triggering factors of debris flows. Remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) are used to obtain datasets of topography, vegetation, human activities and soil factors for local debris flows. The problem of debris flow susceptibility level imbalances in datasets is addressed by the Borderline-SMOTE method. Five machine learning methods, i.e., back propagation neural network (BPNN), one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) have been used to analyze and fit the relationship between debris flow triggering factors and occurrence, and to evaluate the weight of each triggering factor. The ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests have revealed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best mean accuracy (0.924) on ten-fold cross-validation and the performance was significantly better than that of the BPNN (0.871), DT (0.816), and RF (0.901). However, the performance of the XGBoost did not significantly differ from that of the 1D-CNN (0.914). This is also the first comparison experiment between XGBoost and 1D-CNN methods in the DFS study. The DFS maps have been verified by five evaluation methods: Precision, Recall, F1 score, Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). Experiments show that the XGBoost has the best score, and the factors that have a greater impact on debris flows are aspect, annual average rainfall, profile curvature, and elevation.
Highlights
Debris flows involve gravity-driven motion of solid-fluid mixtures with abrupt surge fronts, free upper surfaces, variably erodible basal surfaces, and compositions that may change with position and time [1]
The ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests have revealed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best mean accuracy (0.924) on ten-fold cross-validation and the performance was significantly better than that of the back propagation neural network (BPNN) (0.871), decision tree (DT) (0.816), and random forest (RF) (0.901)
Using Python as the development language, the BPNN and the 1D-CNN are constructed based on the Keras learning framework
Summary
Debris flows involve gravity-driven motion of solid-fluid mixtures with abrupt surge fronts, free upper surfaces, variably erodible basal surfaces, and compositions that may change with position and time [1]. They can cause great damage to the safety of people’s lives and property, public facilities and ecological environment. Due to the harsh natural environment and deforestation caused by over-exploitation of human beings, Shigatse is a typical area with active debris flows in the Tibet Autonomous Region. Mitigating and reducing the disasters caused by debris flows are critical to the local authorities. Zoning debris flow susceptibility (DFS) maps through spatial data can be used to prevent and mitigate casualties and economic losses caused by debris flow events
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.