Abstract

Safety science in healthcare has historically focused primarily on reducing risk and minimizing harm by learning everything possible from when things go wrong (Safety-I). Safety-II encourages the study of all events, including the routine and mundane, not only bad outcomes. While debriefing and learning from positive events is not uncommon or new to simulation, many common debriefing strategies are more focused on Safety-I. The lack of inclusion of Safety-II misses out on the powerful analysis of everyday work.A debriefing tool highlighting Safety-II concepts was developed through expert consensus and piloting and is offered as a guide to encourage and facilitate inclusion of Safety-II analysis into debriefings. It allows for debriefing expansion from the focus on error analysis and “what went wrong” or “could have gone better” to now also capture valuable discussion of high yield Safety-II concepts such as capacities, adjustments, variation, and adaptation for successful operations in a complex system. Additionally, debriefing inclusive of Safety-II fosters increased debriefing overall by encouraging debriefing when “things go right”, not historically what is most commonly debriefed.

Highlights

  • Safety science Safety science has been shifting focus

  • Through searching the literature, expert consensus, and iterative revision based on feedback and piloting, Table 1 represents a tool consisting of specific strategies and sample language and phrases that may be employed to Safety-II concept(s) highlighted phase and goal

  • Current literature suggests that explicit tools for debriefing inclusive of a Safety-II focus are rarely included

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Its elements are Safety-I...and Safety-II...and Safety-III A not unfamiliar occurrence to many debriefers is asking an individual or a team to debrief and being met with a response such as “it went great, I don’t think we need to debrief, I wouldn’t have done anything differently.”. This is a common example of a historically Safety-I focused mindset around debriefing and a prime opportunity to shift and expand focus. As stated by Sidney Dekker, “Safety is not about the absence of negatives It is about the presence of capacities.” [8]. Safety-II offers a paradigm that expands on Safety-I to account for the presence of capacities, as well as the complexity and (2021) 6:9

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call