Abstract
Cases of two types ground much contemporary belief in unconscious perception. First, clinical cases in which perception appears preserved despite loss of consciousness. Second, paradigms in which a stimulus continues to influence responding despite apparently being suppressed from conscious awareness. Seeing is a single fundamental natural kind, of which conscious and unconscious seeing are sub-kinds. This fact provides difficulties for some of the major theories of perception. Unconscious perception be both unconscious and perception, but there is a potential conflict between these desiderata. Ned Block's opening statement describes his favourite case of unconscious seeing: continuous flash suppression. Ned Block suggests a wider significance: unconscious perception threatens naive realism. Block's view rests on two contentions: that conscious and unconscious seeing are of the same fundamental kind, and that unconscious seeing must be a matter of perceptual representation. A. Phillips says unconscious perception of low-level features associated with gender might explain the result.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.