Abstract

BackgroundDeath certificates (DC) can provide valuable health status data regarding disease incidence, prevalence and mortality in a community. It can guide local health policy and help in setting priorities. Incomplete and inaccurate DC data, on the other hand, can significantly impair the precision of a national health information database. In this study we evaluated the accuracy of death certificates at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a Karachi, Pakistan.MethodsA retrospective study conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan for a period of six months. Medical records and death certificates of all patients who died under adult medical service were studied. The demographic characteristics, administrative details, co-morbidities and cause of death from death certificates were collected using an approved standardized form. Accuracy of this information was validated using their medical records. Errors in the death certificates were classified into six categories, from 0 to 5 according to increasing severity; a grade 0 was assigned if no errors were identified, and 5, if an incorrect cause of death was attributed or placed in an improper sequence.Results223 deaths occurred during the study period. 9 certificates were not accessible and 12 patients had incomplete medical records. 202 certificates were finally analyzed. Most frequent errors pertaining to patients’ demographics (92%) and cause/s of death (87%) were identified. 156 (77%) certificates had 3 or more errors and 124 (62%) certificates had a combination of errors that significantly changed the death certificate interpretation. Only 1% certificates were error free.ConclusionA very high rate of errors was identified in death certificates completed at our academic institution. There is a pressing need for appropriate intervention/s to resolve this important issue.

Highlights

  • Death certificates (DC) can provide valuable health status data regarding disease incidence, prevalence and mortality in a community

  • Death certificate data is used to calculate vital statistics and inaccuracies lead to errors in population based studies that rely on these statistics

  • Literature has shown that the error rates in death certificate completion are still very high, ranging from 25% to 78% in hospital-based studies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13], and from 16% to 56% in population-based studies [14,15,16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Death certificates (DC) can provide valuable health status data regarding disease incidence, prevalence and mortality in a community. It can guide local health policy and help in setting priorities. The amount of data contained in each death certificate is limited, but essentially includes identification/demographic data, date and location of death, morbidity data and the cause of death These certificates may play a role in medico-legal investigations, declaration of health events in public health researches [1,2,3], and epidemiological studies to evaluate mortality in a community. Only a few studies have attempted to classify all possible errors into categories [19,20] in an effort to identify the common ones and separate them into minor and major inaccuracies, which would allow for appropriate measures in teaching/ training in an effort to reduce their future occurrence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call