Abstract

Abstract. Forecast verification is a long-standing issue of the whole meteorologists' community. A common definition of a truly satisfying prediction skill has not been achieved so far. Even the definition of "event", due to its spatio-temporal discontinuity, is highly affected by uncertainty. Moreover, decision-making demands numerical weather prediction modellers to provide information about the "inner" uncertainty, i.e. the degree of uncertainty related to the choice of a specific setting of the model (microphysics, turbulence scheme, convective closure, etc.). Most European Mediterranean countries, due to dense development, steep coastal orography and short hydrological response time of the drainage basins, have to deal very frequently with flash floods and sudden shallow land sliding impacting on urban areas. Civil protection organizations are in place to issue early warnings in order to allow local authorities and population to take precautionary measures. To do so in Mediterranean catchments, hydrologists are required to use numerical rainfall predictions in place of rainfall observations on large European catchments. Estimating the measure of uncertainty is for this reason crucial. The goal of this work is to propose an objective evaluation of the performance of the currently operational weather prediction model COSMO-I7 over quite a long time period and to check forecast verification at different space-time scales by the comparison of predictions with observations. Due to large investments in the last years, in fact, Italy has built up one of the most dense hourly-reporting network of rain gauges. The network has a mean space density of about 1/100 km2, very similar to the horizontal resolution of currently operating limited area models. An objective procedure to identify and compare the extreme events of precipitation has been applied to the full set of rainfall observations and over the severe events forecast by COSMO-I7 and announced in official warnings by Italian Civil Protection Department. The procedure allows to classify rainfall events as long-lived and spatially distributed or as having a shorter duration and a minor spatial extent. We show that long-lived events are less affected by overall uncertainty than short-lived ones, yet the inner uncertainty of the event affects both.

Highlights

  • IntroductionExtreme rainfall events frequently produce flash floods (Ferraris et al, 2002) and sudden shallow land sliding in urban areas (Wieczorek and Guzzetti, 2000; Siccardi et al, 2002)

  • One of them (Sect. 3) was a characteristic early fall meso-α scale event started by the orographic lifting over Alps-Apennine divide

  • The performed analyses succeeded in spotting the major features causing COSMO-I7 QPF failures and the good forecast skill shown for a well-defined set of events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extreme rainfall events frequently produce flash floods (Ferraris et al, 2002) and sudden shallow land sliding in urban areas (Wieczorek and Guzzetti, 2000; Siccardi et al, 2002). The interval between rainfall and the impact on developed areas is in the order of hours, shorter than the time needed for the population to take precautionary measures (UNISDR, 2008). Hydrologists are required to make use of rainfall predictions in order to timely estimate the effects on the ground. Has a body of official rules and technical tools for the operational prediction of impending risk scenarios. Predictions are made at the central and/or regional level and inform about the severity of the incoming event (Italy Official Gazette, 2004)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call