Abstract

Some methods of unofficial intervention in protracted intercommunal conflict fail to consider the impact of power asymmetry on the dynamics of conflict and the predictably divergent goals that lower- and higher-power groups seek in unofficial meetings. As a result, third parties face the dilemma of trying to satisfy seemingly irreconcilable goals of the conflicting parties. This article examines asymmetry of goals and the further dilemmas it creates in choosing the level of discourse in unofficial meetings, and in recruiting participants. The authors propose a more proactive research focus on the dynamics of power asymmetry and advance a three-phase strategy for practitioners to deal with the dilemmas of intervening in asymmetrical conflict.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.