Abstract
Numerical taxonomy and pattern recognition analysis offer powerful tools that can greatly reduce the information burden of multiple-assay screening programs. These methods can be used to rationally design prescreens, identify assays that have similar chemical response patterns, select reporter assays for chemical response groups, evaluate drug selectivity, and predict a drug's likely mechanism of action. When combined with assays designed to identify lead compounds that have characteristics likely to cause failure at a later and more expensive stage of development, a simple three-stage primary discovery process consisting of a rational prescreen, reporters, and clinical failure assay can reduce the number of required culture wells by more than 20-fold and can eliminate all but 1–2 drugs per 1000 tested as leads for further evaluation and development.
Highlights
The extraordinary volume of data generated by high throughput screening has shifted the bottlenecks in drug discovery from compound acquisition and screening to the management and analysis of data
How can biological data be used to make the screening process smaller, simpler, faster, and cheaper? And how can biological data be used to better prioritize lead compounds for further development? Numerical taxonomy and pattern recognition o er powerful tools for addressing these questions, and can greatly reduce the information burden of multi-assay screening programs
There are more than 300 di erent human neoplastic diseases, each a potential screening target
Summary
Numerical taxonomy and pattern recognition analysis oå er powerful tools that can greatly reduce the information burden of multiple-assay screening programs. T hese methods can be used to rationally design prescreens, identify assays that have similar chemical response patterns, select reporter assays for chemical response groups, evaluate drug selectivity, and predict a drug’s likely mechanism of action. When combined with assays designed to identify lead compounds that have characteristics likely to cause failure at a later and more expensive stage of development, a simple three-stage primary discovery process consisting of a rational prescreen, reporters, and clinical failure assay can reduce the number of required culture wells by more than 20-fold and can eliminate all but 1–2 drugs per 1000 tested as leads for further evaluation and development
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.