Abstract

BackgroundIn order to get sickness benefit a sick-listed person need a medical certificate issued by a physician; in Sweden after one week of self-certification. Physicians experience sick-listing tasks as problematic and conflicts may arise when patients regard themselves unable to work due to complaints that are hard to objectively verify for the physician. Most GPs and orthopaedic surgeons (OS) deal regularly with sick-listing issues in their daily practice. The aim of this study was to explore perceived problems and coping strategies related to tasks of sickness certification among general practitioners (GP) and orthopaedic surgeons (OS).MethodsA cross-sectional study about sickness certification in two Swedish counties, with 673 participating GPs and 149 OSs, who answered a comprehensive questionnaire. Frequencies together with crude and adjusted (gender and working years) Odds ratios were calculated.ResultsA majority of the GPs and OSs experienced problems in sickness certification every week. To assess the patient's work ability, to handle situations when they and the patient had different opinions about the need for sickness absence, and to issue prolongation certificates when the previous was issued by another physician were reported as problematic by a majority in both groups. Both GPs and OSs prolonged sickness certifications due to waiting times in health care or at Social Insurance Office (SIO). To handle experienced problems they used different strategies; OSs issued sickness certificates without personal appointment more often than the GPs, who on the other hand reported having contact with SIO more often than the OSs. A higher rate of GPs experienced support from management and had a common strategy for handling sickness certification at the clinic than the OSs.ConclusionMost GPs and OSs handled sickness certification weekly and reported a variety of problems in relation to this task, generally GPs to a higher extent, and they used different coping strategies to handle the problems.

Highlights

  • In order to get sickness benefit a sick-listed person need a medical certificate issued by a physician; in Sweden after one week of self-certification

  • The aim of this study was to explore perceived problems, and coping strategies related to sickness certification among general practitioners (GP) and orthopaedic surgeons (OS)

  • There were no significant differences between the GPs (n = 673) and the OSs (n = 149) regarding age, OSs had worked as physicians significantly longer than the GPs and there was a significantly higher rate women among the GPs, Table 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to get sickness benefit a sick-listed person need a medical certificate issued by a physician; in Sweden after one week of self-certification. Physicians experience sick-listing tasks as problematic and conflicts may arise when patients regard themselves unable to work due to complaints that are hard to objectively verify for the physician. The aim of this study was to explore perceived problems and coping strategies related to tasks of sickness certification among general practitioners (GP) and orthopaedic surgeons (OS). Most sickness insurance systems in the Western countries require that patients present a medical certificate issued by a physician after some days of self certification (in Sweden seven days), in order to get sickness benefits when they are unable to work due to disease or injury. The aim of this study was to explore perceived problems, and coping strategies related to sickness certification among GPs and OSs. In the article we report and discuss our findings. The role of physicians in the sick-listing process has been discussed, especially when the absence rate increase [2,3,12,15,16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call