Abstract

The paper reviews a number of challenges associated with reducing degradation and its related emissions through national approaches to REDD+ under UNFCCC policy. It proposes that in many countries, it may in the short run be easier to deal with the kinds of degradation that result from locally driven community over-exploitation of forest for livelihoods, than from selective logging or fire control. Such degradation is low-level, but chronic, and is experienced over very large forest areas. Community forest management programmes tend to result not only in reduced degradation, but also in forest enhancement; moreover they are often popular, and do not require major political shifts. In principle these approaches therefore offer a quick start option for REDD+. Developing reference emissions levels for low-level locally driven degradation is difficult however given that stock losses and gains are too small to be identified and measured using remote sensing, and that in most countries there is little or no forest inventory data available. We therefore propose that forest management initiatives at the local level, such as those promoted by community forest management programmes, should monitor, and be credited for, only the net increase in carbon stock over the implementation period, as assessed by ground level surveys at the start and end of the period. This would also resolve the problem of nesting (ensuring that all credits are accounted for against the national reference emission level), since communities and others at the local level would be rewarded only for increased sequestration, while the national reference emission level would deal only with reductions in emissions from deforestation and degradation.

Highlights

  • Degradation - the loss of biomass in ‘forests which remain forests’ [1] - is one of the five components included in international policy on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD +), the others being deforestation, forest enhancement, sustainable management of forests (SFM) and conservation [2]

  • This paper provides a short review of the technical challenges involved in defining degradation for the purposes of REDD+, and suggests an approach that would enable countries to start measuring the carbon impacts of programmes dealing with emissions from degradation, in particular by addressing locally-driven degradation associated with subsistence use of forest by local communities

  • Community forest management offers a quick start option in national REDD+ programmes by which some types of degradation - degradation that is caused by community over-exploitation of forests for livelihood purposes - can be tackled

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Degradation - the (anthropogenic) loss of biomass in ‘forests which remain forests’ [1] - is one of the five components included in international policy on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD +), the others being deforestation, forest enhancement, sustainable management of forests (SFM) and conservation [2]. We argue that forest enhancement as a component in REDD+ is for all practical purposes ‘negative’ (or ‘reversed’) degradation, and a direct result of improved management It can and should be measured using the same metrics as those used for degradation. We go on to suggest that in the short term it may be easier to combat the kinds of degradation that are related to local community use of forests than those associated with selective logging or with fire. This can be done through programmes of community management, which offer a route for countries to get to grips with at least those degradation emissions which are community-induced, rather quickly. In the future, when sufficient data is available to construct credible reference emission levels for degradation, a decision would have to be made about to whom these avoided degradation credits pertain

Discussion
Conclusions
Findings
23. UNFCCC
28. Wiersum KF
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call