Abstract

My PhD is inspired by both disability studies and feminist perspectives on labour market structures for several reasons. The existing research on deaf people and their experience of work is often focused on problems, issues, and experiences of lack/deficiency: lack of accessibility, poor communication with colleges and surrounding society, high levels of unemployment or underemployment. The data are often statistics and remain un-theorized; there is little qualitative data. Although it is important data, especially on a political level, they do not provide much information on how deaf people navigate and strategize career progress and advancement. Furthermore, they do not shed light on creative and useful coping strategies for facing structural discrimination and (audist) micro-aggressions. My research aims to change this. In the PhD, I will contribute to the transformation of deaf studies research by suggesting how to benefit from other studies on minority workers and employment and combine deaf studies with theoretical concepts from these fields. One example is that both gender and disability research have analysed how minority employees (women or disabled people) use different strategies for coping with work life (Church et al 2007, Taub et al 2004, Benschop et al 2011, Bird et al 2011) and how this effects culture and dynamics in the work place. Hiding and disclosing strategies are frequently mentioned among disability studies (Kafer 2016 ) Price et al 2017). When the disabled employee has either a visible or invisible disability, he/she might often choose to hide the disability by not meeting customers face to face and instead interacting through phone calls or emails (Church et al. 2007) This points in a different direction than recent studies on deaf people’s employment experience such as Friedner (2013) showing how the neo-liberal labour market also produces disability as value. Based on my qualitative study of deaf-led businesses in Denmark I propose, in line with Friedner’s argument around value, that the traditional theorisation of disability/deafness as stigma should be expanded to bring attention to questions of value, agency and coping strategies and explore how deaf people navigate and experience their opportunities and positions in labour market with ambivalences. The Major Review Report is based on a scoping study which is conducted by a focus group with British deaf people who are self-employed or own business (with several employees). Among the 7 participants 4 are female and 3 are male. The 4 females are all self-employed and do not employ other people. 3 of them do not specifically target at deaf markets. 2 of the 3 male participants have experience or still are business owners. The last one is self-employed. All the male participants provide service targeting at deaf people/sign language. The interview was conducted in order to explore the broad experience of business ownership and self-employment among deaf people in UK. There are almost no studies of it. Use of focus group helps to collect data from several people once. Moreover it also can provide a setting where the deaf participants can share and tell each others their experience. In this manner, the interactionist perspective on how they talk about deaf self-employment and business ownership, and how they talk about their experience as deaf, men, women and other positions in relation to the employment context.

Highlights

  • Pilot study performed in the UK

  • Coping strategies employed by deaf business owners/employees in the intersection between a deaf-structured work place and a hearing structured labour market

  • “Hearing employers would not know how to use the deaf people without education

Read more

Summary

Findings

India: Neoliberalism Coffee shops: employing deaf people Discourses on disabled workers as stable workers Appeals to affective economy (Friedner 2013). Not always positive experience, not promoted, isolated. Feminist studies: humour/irony, casting themselves as mothers for younger male employees/ claiming to work extra hard. Gay men: struggles with normative discourses of professionalism (as masculine/heterosexual) to maintain a positive identity

Methods
Aims at understanding
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.