Abstract
Legal provisions for the introduction of deadlines for cassation are examined. The author analyzes different points of view on setting the deadline for cassation in the procedure of overall cassation, as well as the legal position of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the assessment of cassation revision of court decisions on criminal cases from the standpoint of their effectiveness. The author identifies the factors that allowed the European Court of Human Rights to recognize that cassation court procedures for final court decisions as part of overall cassation are an effective means of legal defense. The author also examines the reasons due to which cassation procedures for appealing interim decisions and decisions examined in the procedure of selective cassation cannot be recognized as an effective means of legal defense.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
