Abstract

ObjectiveInvasive mechanical ventilation poses a strong risk factor for the development of chronic lung disease in preterm infants. A reduction of the dead space as part of the total breathing volume would reduce the ventilation effort and thereby lower the risk of ventilator‐induced lung injuries. In this experimental study, we compared the efficacy of mechanical dead space washout via uncontrolled and controlled leakage flow in their ability to eliminate CO2 during conventional ventilation in preterm infants.MethodsThree frequently used neonatal ventilators, operating under standard conventional ventilating parameters, were individually connected to a test lung. To maintain a constant physiological end‐expiratory pCO2 level during ventilation, the test lung was continuously flooded with CO2. A side port in the area of the connector between the endotracheal tube and the flow sensor allowed breathing gas to escape passively or in a second experimental setup, regulated by a pump. Measurements of end‐expiratory pCO2 were taken in both experiments and compared to end‐expiratory pCO2 levels of ventilation without active dead space leakage.ResultsFollowing dead space washout, a significant reduction of end‐expiratory pCO2 was attained. Under conditions of uncontrolled leakage, the mean decrease was 14.1% while controlled leakage saw a mean reduction of 16.1%.ConclusionWashout of dead space by way of leakage flow is an effective method to reduce end‐expiratory pCO2. Both controlled and uncontrolled leakage provide comparable results, but precise regulation of leakage allows for a more stable ventilation by preventing uncontrolled loss of tidal volume during inspiration.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.