Abstract

The Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in the Media case focuses on the responsibility of three individuals charged on the basis of their control of a radio channel and a newspaper in Rwanda. Due to overt freedom of speech issues relating to this Judgment, it was immediately mass-mediatized. This article analyses the case from a purely legal perspective, focusing on the issue of `how` the Judges determined the culpability of individuals for crimes concerning the media`s influence in the preparation and execution of mass crimes. Some critical elements appear in this perspective, including: the (il)legitimacy of the extension of jurisdiction ratione temporis; the (in)opportunity to establish the mens rea of an inchoate offence via the actus reus of a non-inchoate offence; the (un)certain distinction between forms of direct and indirect participation; and the (in)determination of the criteria applied to reduce the sentence against one of the accused (as a form of reparation for the violation of procedure by the Prosecutor).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.