Abstract
Restrictions upon the emphyteutic holder's rights that are contrary to article 569 C.c. are sufficient justification for depriving a transaction of its emphyteutic character. However it is erroneous, upon rendering such a decision, to pretend that emphyteusis carries with it alienation of property and that a contract so qualified by parties must be considered as an ordinary lease if any doubts arise as to the real nature of the agreement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
