Abstract

We provide a new convergence proof of the celebrated Merriman–Bence–Osher scheme for multiphase mean curvature flow. Our proof applies to the new variant incorporating a general class of surface tensions and mobilities, including typical choices for modeling grain growth. The basis of the proof are the minimizing movements interpretation of Esedoḡlu and Otto and De Giorgi’s general theory of gradient flows. Under a typical energy convergence assumption we show that the limit satisfies a sharp energy-dissipation relation.

Highlights

  • The thresholding scheme is a highly efficient computational scheme for multiphase mean curvature flow (MCF) which was originally introduced by Merriman, Bence, and Osher [27, 28]

  • The main motivation for MCF comes from metallurgy where it models the slow relaxation of grain boundaries in polycrystals [31]

  • The effective surface tension σi j (ν) and the mobility μi j (ν) of a grain boundary depend on the mismatch between the lattices of the two adjacent grains i and j and on the relative orientation of the grain boundary, given by its normal vector ν

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The thresholding scheme is a highly efficient computational scheme for multiphase mean curvature flow (MCF) which was originally introduced by Merriman, Bence, and Osher [27, 28]. The effective surface tension σi j (ν) and the mobility μi j (ν) of a grain boundary depend on the mismatch between the lattices of the two adjacent grains i and j and on the relative orientation of the grain boundary, given by its normal vector ν. It is well known that for small mismatch angles, the dependence on the normal can be neglected [32]. Where Vi j and Hi j denote the normal velocity and mean curvature of the grain boundary i j = ∂ i ∩ ∂ j , respectively. These equations are coupled by the Herring angle condition

35 Page 2 of 42
35 Page 4 of 42
Setup and the modified thresholding scheme
The modified algorithm
35 Page 6 of 42
Connection to De Giorgi’s minimizing movements
Statement of results
35 Page 12 of 42
Construction of suitable partitions of unity
Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Lemma 4
35 Page 16 of 42
35 Page 18 of 42
Proof of Proposition 1
35 Page 22 of 42
35 Page 24 of 42
35 Page 26 of 42
35 Page 28 of 42
35 Page 30 of 42
35 Page 32 of 42
Proof of Proposition 2
35 Page 34 of 42
35 Page 36 of 42
Proof of Lemma 5
35 Page 38 of 42
Consistency and monotonicity
Improved convergence of the energies
Some inequalities
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call