Abstract
If de Finetti got it from Hume, then Hume got it from Carneades (ca. 200 B.C.), via Cicero, Sextus Empiricus, Montaigne, and Bayle.2 It is something of a pun to call it “probabilism” over the whole 2000 years and more of that line, but you can see why it is so called by dipping into an English translation of Cicero’s Latin rendering (in a dialogue) of the Greek of Carneades’s student, Clitomachus:3 Carneades holds ... that there is no presentation of such a sort as to result in knowledge through perception, but many that result in a judgement of probability. For it is contrary to nature for nothing to be probable, and entails that entire subversion of life of which you, Lucullus, were speaking; accordingly even many sense-percepts must be deemed probable, if only it be held in mind that no sense-presentation has such a character as a false presentation could not also have without differing from it at all.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
