Abstract
De facto entities (most importantly for this discussion, those in Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria and the alleged People's Republics in south-eastern Ukraine), if viewed from a formal-legal point of view, do not exist for the international community. However, the “virtual” existence of those states does not prevent them from being real participants in the political and security processes in the post-Soviet space. Many momentous events in Eurasia are connected in some way with developments surrounding these statelets. This article reviews the establishment of de facto states in the context of the demise of the USSR, ethno-political self-determination during this process and the transformation of international law after the end of the Cold War. The article provides a definition and typology of unrecognized states, and explains their similarities and differences. It is argued that the phenomenon of de facto entities cannot be reduced exclusively to the consequences of “frozen conflict”: their domestic dynamics as well as processes of democratization and nation/state-building also need to be considered. Special attention is paid to the importance of Eurasian de facto states for international affairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.