Abstract

The creativity in the world and the reality of God. The theology of Gordon Kaufman in relation to Wilhelm Herrmann and Rudolf Bultmann. The article aims to defend the compatibility of Kaufman’s concept of a world grounded on immanent creativity and Bultmann’s concept of God who addresses us in the proclamation of the cross. Since Darwin’s natural selection it is hard to conceive of a universe that is designed and allows for the assumption of a creator. Theologians have grappled with the meaning of nature and history from the time their purposiveness was contested. Wilhelm Herrmann argued that we undergo a transforming goodness in our experiences of Jesus’ inner life which makes us confess that the goodness of a hidden God determines the world and makes us contribute to its development. We cannot prove the influence of God’s goodness, but we can experience it personally. Rudolf Bultmann radically changed this perspective. He argued that we are not placed in a meaningful world on behalf of Jesus’ inner life; instead, the proclamation of the cross liberates us from any worldview in order to live authentically. Gordon Kaufman proposes an understanding of God as the creativity in the world and its evolution without any dualism or supernaturalism. He denies a blueprint for creation but accepts a serendipitous creativity that can function as the basis for the articulation of our worldview and our orientation in the world. According to Kaufman, Bultmann still retains the dualistic presupposition of the traditional understanding of God. This article argues that the differences between Kaufman and Bultmann are limited, for whereas Bultmannn underlines the reality of God who addresses us in the proclamation of the cross and thereby recreates us, Kaufman wants to construct a worldview grounded on creativity. The creativity in the world and God’s (re)creative acts are not incompatible.

Highlights

  • Read online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online

  • Wilhelm Herrmann argued that we undergo a transforming goodness in our experiences of Jesus’ inner life which makes us confess that the goodness of a hidden God determines the world and makes us contribute to its development

  • De opvattingen van Darwin hebben grote gevolgen gehad voor ons denken over de natuur en dientengevolge ook voor die theologie die zich van de natuurwetenschappen rekenschap wil geven (Smedes 2009)

Read more

Summary

Original Research

How to cite this article: Benjamins, R., 2013, ‘De creativiteit in de wereld en de werkelijkheid van God. De theologie van Gordon Kaufman in betrekking tot Wilhelm Herrmann en Rudolf Bultmann’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 69(1), Art. Een onverkorte overname van Darwins opvattingen was daarmee voor geen van deze theologen mogelijk, omdat ze ofwel verdedigden dat God door wonderen in de natuur ingrijpt, ofwel geloofden dat de gesloten natuurwetmatigheid zelf doelgericht is, ofwel geloofden in een beschouwingswijze van doelgerichtheid die natuurwetenschappelijk weliswaar niet kan worden bewezen, maar ook niet ontkracht. Ik doe dat door hem te vergelijken met Wilhelm Herrmann en Rudolf Bultmann die in hun eigen tijd al evenzeer probeerden om aan te sluiten bij het moderne wereldbeeld, maar toch niet prijs wilden geven wat Kaufman – zelfs expliciet tegen Bultmann – los laat

Wilhelm Herrmann
Rudolf Bultmann
Gordon Kaufman
Tegenstrijdige belangen
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call