Abstract
ABSTRACT Loose women are those whose behaviour and lifestyles do not fit the gendered norm of dependency and male patronage. Despite the elusive nature of the adjective ‘loose’, loose women are often visualised as sexually unrestrained, who need to be codified andcontrolled. The looseness of this category, and yet its strategic and historical use to restrain women, is curiously under-analyzed. I compare the history of the codification ‘prostitutes’ in British Colonial Africa (with a focus on South Africa and the Cape Colony), and British India to understand the impact of this codification. I argue that the codification of prostitution was not merely a reflection of colonial sexual anxieties but the need to restrain the autonomy of working women, at large. Colonial laws had a twin effect of controlling morality and (gendered) labour markets, by restricting women to the home or to labour markets deemed legitimate for their gender and race.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
