Abstract
Quotation is a discourse phenomenon characterised by a textual relation of embedding. As a result, quotations are inherently ambiguous. The quoted source is basically liable for the content of the quotation, but due to several circumstances (such as the social position of the quoting and quoted source, the formal aspects of the way the quotation is embedded, and the function of the quotation) the liability may partly or fully shift to the quoting source. This paper examines a corpus of both criminal and civil cases from Dutch jurisprudence in which a text, in particular a quotation in the text, became the subject of the judicial formation of a judgement. The analysis focuses on whether and how the courts ground their judgments (who is why liable?) in characteristics of the text and of the communication process surrounding the text.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
