Abstract

Abstract. This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics–dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.

Highlights

  • Supercells are strong, long-lived convective cells containing deep, persistent rotating updrafts that operate on spatial scales O(10 km)

  • The following section describes the results of the supercell test case during DCMIP2016, both from a intermodel time evolution perspective and intramodel sensitivity to model resolution and ensuing convergence

  • Non-hydrostatic dynamics are required for accurate representation of supercells

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Supercells are strong, long-lived convective cells containing deep, persistent rotating updrafts that operate on spatial scales O(10 km). The supercell test applied in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016) (Ullrich et al, 2017) permits the study of a non-hydrostatic moist flow field with strong vertical velocities and associated precipitation. This test is based on the work of Klemp and Wilhelmson (1978) and Klemp et al (2015), and assesses the performance of global numerical models at extremely high spatial resolution. It has recently been used in the evaluation of next-generation weather prediction systems (Ji and Toepfer, 2016)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call