Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer globally and accounts for the second highest cancer-associated mortality rate in the world. Current treatment strategies for gastric cancer include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy may increase the IP concentrations of chemotherapy drugs and reduce the systemic toxicity. At present, IP chemotherapy is used to treat patients with advanced gastric cancer, which has a high rate of peritoneal recurrence. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) in an IP and intravenous (IV) dual chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The treatment-associated adverse reactions and preliminary efficacy were reported. The first dose level utilized the full dose of DCF: Docetaxel, day one, 45 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); cisplatin (DDP), day one, 75 mg/m2 (IP); and fluorouracil (FU), days one to five, 750 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of six patients were treated at this level and two patients withdrew due to serious adverse reactions. Taking into account that the the tolerated doses used in combination regimens for Eastern populations are lower than that of the corresponding doses for Western populations, the dosages of the three drugs were all reduced by 20% in the application of the second dose level: Docetaxel, day one, 30 mg/m2 (IP) and day eight, 30 mg/m2 (IV); DDP, day two, 60 mg/m2 (IP); and FU, days one to five, 600 mg/m2 (continuous IV). A total of 26 patients were treated at this level. The main adverse reaction was bone marrow suppression, with grade III/IV neutropenia, leukopenia and febrile neutropenia accounting for 61.5, 53.8 and 19.2% of reactions, respectively, and grade III/IV anemia and thrombocytopenia accounting for 19.2 and 15.4% of reactions, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions primarily consisted of abdominal pain, with grade III/IV abdominal pain accounting for 30.8% of reactions. Only 7.7% of the patients withdrew from the treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was five months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0–9.0 months], and the median overall survival (OS) was nine months (95% CI, 7.4–10.6 months). It was concluded that the DCF regimen with reduced dosage should be applied. IP and IV dual chemotherapy for the treatment of unresectable advanced gastric cancer is tolerated and demonstrated a good initial efficacy. Strategies for mitigating and reducing the adverse gastrointestinal reactions, particularly abdominal pain, may be the focus of future studies.

Highlights

  • According to global cancer statistics, gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and exhibits the second highest mortality rate

  • Between July 2010 and June 2013, a total of 32 advanced gastric cancer patients who all possessed unresectable lesions were enrolled in the present study

  • Chinese gastric cancer patients account for almost half of all gastric cancer patients worldwide [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to global cancer statistics, gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and exhibits the second highest mortality rate. The main endpoint of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of dual IP and IV DCF chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. The present study enrolled patients from North China Petroleum Bureau General Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Renqui, China) in the III‐IV clinical stages of disease with unresectable gastric cancer that was pathologically or cytologically confirmed, locally‐advanced, metastasized or recurrent, and who possessed at least one evaluable lesion. From the seventh patient onward, the chemotherapy dosages of all three drugs were reduced by 20% This provided the doses of docetaxel at 30 mg/m2 via IP perfusion on day one and 30 mg/m2 via IV infusion on day eight; DDP at 60 mg/m2 via IP perfusion on day two; and FU at 600 mg/m2 via continuous IV infusion once per day for five days. SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis, and the Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate the TTP and OS of the patients

Results
Discussion
Ajani JA
Bijelic L and Sugarbaker PH
17. Wu Y and Wu W
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call