Abstract

Gene editing is a powerful tool for genome and cell engineering. Exemplified by CRISPR–Cas, gene editing could cause DNA damage and trigger DNA repair processes that are often error-prone. Such unwanted mutations and safety concerns can be exacerbated when altering long sequences. Here we couple microbial single-strand annealing proteins (SSAPs) with catalytically inactive dCas9 for gene editing. This cleavage-free gene editor, dCas9–SSAP, promotes the knock-in of long sequences in mammalian cells. The dCas9–SSAP editor has low on-target errors and minimal off-target effects, showing higher accuracy than canonical Cas9 methods. It is effective for inserting kilobase-scale sequences, with an efficiency of up to approximately 20% and robust performance across donor designs and cell types, including human stem cells. We show that dCas9–SSAP is less sensitive to inhibition of DNA repair enzymes than Cas9 references. We further performed truncation and aptamer engineering to minimize its size to fit into a single adeno-associated-virus vector for future application. Together, this tool opens opportunities towards safer long-sequence genome engineering.

Highlights

  • Gene editing is a powerful tool for genome and cell engineering

  • Here we report the development of a dCas9–single-strand annealing proteins (SSAPs) editor, which harmonizes the RNA-guided programmability of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) with the SSAP activity of phage RecT

  • This dCas9–SSAP editor enables long-sequence editing with minimal DNA damage and errors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gene editing is a powerful tool for genome and cell engineering. Exemplified by CRISPR–Cas, gene editing could cause DNA damage and trigger DNA repair processes that are often error-prone. We reasoned that the key enzyme for microbial recombination, the single-strand annealing protein (SSAP), could be useful for cleavage-free gene editing in mammalian cells It does not have DNA-cleavage activity[26,27]; it may not trigger the error-prone pathways needed by Cas[9] editing. Motivated by this hypothesis and our previous work showing its ability to stimulate genomic recombination, we developed a gene-editing tool using deactivated Cas[9] (dCas[9], or catalytically inactive Cas9) and microbial SSAPs31–38.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.