Abstract

In office buildings, daylight is an important natural resource, as it is profusely available during occupied hours. However, its use can increase energy consumption for air conditioning. Therefore, combining this resource with side lighting systems and promoting its integration with electric lighting is essential to obtain an energy balance. This paper aims to analyze daylight performance and the energy consumption for lighting and air conditioning considering four types of glazing, four orientations, from window-to-wall ratios varying between 40% to 100% for bare and shaded window models in an office room located in a subtropical city in southern Brazil. The methodology was based on Useful Daylight Illuminance levels of 500 to 2,500 lx, Daylight Autonomy levels of 500 lx, and total energy consumption through simulation in DesignBuilder software. The results showed that L13 glazing is not recommended for bare and shaded windows, regardless of window orientation. M76 presented the best performance for energy consumption for West shaded windows. For the West, shading is necessary irrespective of the glazing type (except L13, whose best performance is for bare windows) from WWR 50%. M76 and M52 had the lowest total energy consumption. The findings of this study add to an understanding of the energy savings and lighting performance of different types of glazing, combined with window apertures, and solar orientations for a subtropical climate. Furthermore, the study shows that the choice of glazing depends not only on the presence of shading but also on the orientation and WWR, without a linear behavior.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call