Day‐to‐Day Reproducibility of the Near‐infrared Spectroscopy Venous Occlusion Technique in Young Healthy Adults

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that the near‐infrared spectroscopy venous occlusion technique (NIRS‐VOT) provides a valid assessment of regional forearm muscle blood flow; however, day‐to‐day reproducibility of hemodynamic variables derived from the NIRS‐VOT remains to be determined, particularly across the range of physiological blood flows observed during handgrip exercise.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the day‐to‐day reproducibility of forearm hemodynamics assessed via the NIRS‐VOT.MethodsNear‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data were obtained from the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle on the right arm of 14 young, healthy adults (age: 27 ± 6 yrs; BMI: 24.6 ± 2.8 kg·m−2). The NIRS‐VOT was performed via rapid inflation of a pneumatic cuff placed on the upper arm for approximately 10 s. The NIRS‐VOT was performed at rest, and immediately after a 15 s isometric handgrip contraction at 20%, 40% and 60% of the subject’s maximum voluntary contraction. Measurements were repeated 3–5 times. Participants returned to the laboratory for a second visit on a separate day, and repeated the same number of measurements. Forearm blood flow (FBF), and blood pressure were measured on a beat‐by‐beat basis, and forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated. FBF and FVC were subsequently compared for day‐to‐day reproducibility.ResultsFBF and FVC significantly increased with the intensity of handgrip exercise (P< 0.05); however, these measures of forearm hemodynamics were not significantly different (P >0.05) between Day 1 and Day 2 at each exercise‐intensity (Table 1).ConclusionThe findings of the present study indicate that the NIRS‐VOT provides a reliable assessment of regional forearm muscle hemodynamics across a physiological range of blood flows incurred by isometric handgrip exercise.Support or Funding InformationMJJ is funded by the NIH (R‐35‐HL139854) and the Mayo Foundation. CCW is supported by the NIH training grant (5T32DK007352‐39), JRS is supported by AHA (18POST3990251), and TJC is funded by AFAR Postdoctoral Transition Award (DIAMOND18161). FBF and FVC on experimental days Day 1 Day 2 P‐value FBF, mL·min−1·100mL−1 (tissue) Rest 2.0 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.2 0.001 20% MVC 14.4 ± 2.65 15.4 ± 2.4 0.679 40% MVC 26.0 ± 5.19 28.0 ± 4.3 0.606 60% MVC 39.4 ± 6.39 47.4 ± 7.7 0.858 FVC, mL·min−1·100 mmHg−1 Rest 170 ± 47.3 72 ± 16.4 0.001 20% MVC 1297 ± 227.8 1454 ± 209.6 0.380 40% MVC 2496 ± 492.8 2656 ± 434.0 0.912 60% MVC 3820 ± 659.1 4542 ± 744.7 0.535 MVC, kg 49.4 ± 3.0 47.9 ± 2.6 0.721 Abbreviations: FBF, forearm blood flow; FVC, forearm vascular conductance; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction. Values are presented as means ± SE. P values indicate comparison between days 1 and 2.