Abstract
In the field of social sciences and particularly in economics, studies have frequently reported a lack of reproducibility of published research. Most often, this is due to the unavailability of data reproducing the findings of a study. However, over the past years, debates on open science practices and reproducible research have become stronger and louder among research funders, learned societies, and research organisations. Many of these have started to implement data policies to overcome these shortcomings. Against this background, the article asks if there have been changes in the way economics journals handle data and other materials that are crucial to reproduce the findings of empirical articles. For this purpose, all journals listed in the Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports edition for economics have been evaluated for policies on the disclosure of research data. The article describes the characteristics of these data policies and explicates their requirements. Moreover, it compares the current findings with the situation some years ago. The results show significant changes in the way journals handle data in the publication process. Research libraries can use the findings of this study for their advisory activities to best support researchers in submitting and providing data as required by journals.
Highlights
Journals are on the forefront of the scientific ecosystem
The aim of this paper was to answer the question of how economics journals today deal with the inclusion of underlying data and analysis of an article in the peer review and publication process
We analysed how many of the journals listed in the 2017 edition of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) ECON have specific rules that address the use of data in the peer review or publication processes
Summary
Journals are on the forefront of the scientific ecosystem. Because of their peerreview processes, they are an important instance to ensure scientific quality and integrity. Against the background of an ever growing amount of publications (Johnson et al, 2018) and public debates on ‘fake journals’ and ‘predatory publishing’ (cf Hern & Duncan, 2018), quality assurance mechanisms like the peer-review process should ensure that only well founded research is published in the pages of scholarly journals. Research libraries have developed a variety of services to help researchers find appropriate journals to publish their findings. Peer review and adherence to good scientific practice are key requirements for selecting a suitable journal
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.