Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
On 8 June 2004, Advocate-General Stix-Hackl at last delivered her opinion on the questions referred to the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) by the English Court of Appeal in the British Horseracing Board v William Hill case. In doing so, the Advocate-General (“A-G”) has provided some useful clarification of the scope of the protection afforded by database rights. We now await to hear further from the ECJ, although there is currently no indication as to when a final judgment can be expected.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology and Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
