Abstract

Panel data transcends cross-sectional data by tapping pooled inter- and intra-individual differences, along with between and within individual variation separately. In the present study these micro variations in ill-being are predicted by psychological indicators constructed from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). Panel regression effects are corrected for errors-in-variables, which attenuate slopes estimated by traditional panel regressions. These corrections reveal that unhappiness and life dissatisfaction are distinct variables that have different psychological causations.

Highlights

  • Panel data transcends cross-sectional data by tapping pooled inter- and intra-individual differences, along with between and within individual variation separately

  • The present paper strengthens this multi-dimensionality with the discovery that different aspects of depression drive unhappiness and dissatisfaction in very different ways

  • Bechtel (2007) found that mental distress was the strongest driver of life dissatisfaction as self-reported on the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) and the European Social Survey (ESS)

Read more

Summary

Dissatisfaction and unhappiness as separate dimensions of ill-being

The history of the concept of happiness, stretching over two thousand years, is not a simple one. To be satisfied with life is not the same thing as to attain perfection or to enjoy a long succession of pleasures This modern conflation of happiness and satisfaction was picked up in the 1970’s by the social indicators movement in three different ways. Andrews and Withey (1974) introduced the following life quality scale in the lead article of the maiden issue of Social Indicators Research: Terrible Unhappy Mostly satisfied Mostly Pleased Delighted dissatisfied and dissatisfied Satisfied This sequence of response labels presumes that (dis)satisfaction constitutes the core of a wellbeing continuum, and that (un)happiness constitutes the extremes of this single dimension. Gundelach and Kreiner (2004, p.363) concluded that happiness and satisfaction are correlated, distinct variables In this same year Michalos, who has edited Social Indicators Research since its inception in 1974, noted that. The present paper strengthens this multi-dimensionality with the discovery that different aspects of depression drive unhappiness and dissatisfaction in very different ways

The role of depression in ill-being
The study plan
Dimensions of Depression
Equally-spaced response codes
Multiple-item scores
Census and Sample Panels
True parameter identification
Estimation from the BHPS sample
Correlations between unhappiness and life dissatisfaction
Reliabilities of Depression Scores
Effects of depression on ill-being
True-Value Regression in Micro Data Syntaxes

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.