Abstract

A key factor in building effective writer identification/verification systems is the amount of data required to build the underlying models. In this research we systematically examine data sufficiency bounds for two broad approaches to online writer identification--feature space models vs. writer-style space models. We report results from 40 experiments conducted on two publicly available datasets and also test identification performance for the target models using two different feature functions. Our findings show that the writer-style space model gives higher identification performance for a given level of data and further, achieves high performance levels with lesser data costs. This model appears to require as less as 20 words per page to achieve identification performance close to 80% and reaches more than 90% accuracy with higher levels of data enrollment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.