Data Resource: population level family justice administrative data with opportunities for data linkage.

Rhodri David Johnson,Simon Thompson,Karen Broadhurst,Stefanie Doebler,David V Ford,Liz Trinder,Kerina Jones,Lucy J Griffiths,Bachar Alrouh,Alexandra Lee,Ashley Akbari,Jon Smart,Linda Cusworth,Stuart Bedston

doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1339

Rhodri David Johnson, Simon Thompson + Show 12 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1339

Copy DOI

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough there has been considerable progress in the use of administrative data for applied health research, the family justice field lags behind. Better use of administrative data are essential to enhance understanding of how the family justice system is working, as well as the characteristics of, and outcomes for, children and families. The Family Justice Data Partnership (FJDP) supports this aim through analyses of core family justice and linked datasets in the SAIL Databank (Secure Anonymised Information Linkage). Cafcass Cymru provide expert advice for children involved in family court proceedings in Wales, ensuring decisions are made in the best interests of the child. We provide an overview of Cafcass Cymru data. We also describe and illustrate linkage to administrative datasets within SAIL.MethodsCafcass Cymru data was transferred to SAIL using a standardised approach to provide de-identified data with Anonymised Linking Fields (ALF) for successfully matched records. Three cohorts were created: all individuals involved in family court applications; all individuals with an ALF allowing subsequent health data linkage; and all individuals with a Residential Anonymised Linking Field (RALF) enabling area-level deprivation analysis.ResultsCafcass Cymru application data are available for child protection matters (public law, range 2011-2019, n=12,745), and child arrangement disputes (private law, range 2005-2019, n=52,023). An 80% data linkage match rate was achieved. 40% had hospital admissions within two years pre or post application; 54% had emergency department attendances and 61% had outpatient appointments. Individuals were more likely to reside in deprived areas regardless of law type.ConclusionCafcass Cymru data can be accessed through the SAIL Databank. The FJDP will continue to enhance research opportunities for all to better understand the family justice system, and outcomes for those involved, such as health and wellbeing for children and family members.

Highlights

There has been considerable progress in the use of administrative data for applied health research, the family justice field lags behind
Cafcass Cymru application data are available for child protection matters, and child arrangement disputes
Law type indicator held in the Application table. The implication of this process of selection, is that an individual could be classed as public law in our cohort, but have previously been involved in a private law case

Summary

Introduction

There has been considerable progress in the use of administrative data for applied health research, the family justice field lags behind. Parents or other carers who cannot agree on arrangements apply to the court for an order, typically following divorce or separation and concerning with whom a child should live and the time a child should spend with a non-resident parent [1]. Despite this pivotal role, far too little is known about whether the family justice system is delivering the best possible outcomes for children and families, and/or whether policy and legislative change is effective [2]. Open Access under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en)

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion