Data Quality Assessment of Time-Variable Surface Microgravity Surveys in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Abstract

Ground-based time-variable gravimetry with high accuracy is an important approach in monitoring geodynamic processes. The uncertainty of instruments including scale factor (SF) and drift rate are the primary factors affect the quality of observation data. Differing from the conventional gravity adjustment procedure, this study adopted the modified Bayesian gravity adjustment (MBGA) method, which accounts for the nonlinear drift rate, and where the SF is considered as one of the hyperparameters estimated using Akaike’s Bayesian information criterion. Based on the terrestrial time-variable gravity datasets (2018–2020) from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau, errors caused by nonlinear drift rate and SF were processed quantitatively through analysis of the gravity difference (GD) residuals and the mutual difference of the GD. Additionally, cross validation from absolute gravity (AG) values was also applied. Results suggest that: (1) the drift rate of relavive instruments show nonlinear characteristics, and owing to their different spring features, the drift rate of CG-5 is much larger than that of LCR-G gravimeters; (2) the average bias between the original and optimized SF of the CG-5 gravimeters is approximately 169 ppm, while that of the LCR-G is no more than 63 ppm; (3) comparison of the differences in gravity values (GV) suggests that the uncertainty caused by the nonlinear drift rate is smaller than that attributable to SF. Overall, the novel approach adopted in this study was found effective in removing errors, and shown to be adaptive and robust for large-scale hybrid surface gravity campaign which providing high accuracy gravity data for the geoscience research.